8, Greystone Close, B98 9HU
Property data
- Sale history
-
Price Date Annual growth After inflation £125,000 Jun 2016 2.0% -0.2% £104,000 Jan 2007 na na - Floor plan
- Internal area
- 77 square metres (829 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
- £ per square meter (foot)
- £1,623 per sqm (£151 per sqft) in Jun 2016. For context, homes in Church Hill are now selling for between £2,290 and £3,680 per square metre (£212 and £341 per square foot) . See the analysis of Church Hill B98-9 housing market.
- Valuation comparables
- Infer the current value by seeing what similar properties have sold for recently. To view this list for 8, Greystone Close using the valuation comparables search tool, join now.
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Type
- Terrace
- Council tax band
- B
- Plot size
- 124 square metres (1,335 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
- History:
- Archived sales listing for 8 Greystone Close. Advertised on multiple portals. It was added on 06/02/2016. It last appeared Jun 2016.
- Photos:
-
There are 11 historic photos of 8 Greystone Close.
- Advertiser remarks:
-
- 3 bedrooms
- 1 bathrooms
Planning applications
- Planning ref:
- December 2023 TPO23/156
- Type:
- Tree and hedge works
- Status:
- Application refused
- Address:
- Land adjacent to 8 Greystone Close, Redditch, Please refer to site plan
- Description:
- Our Ref: 213340Statement of Reasons for Tree Preservation Order Application tofell and treat Oak trees (T1, T2, T3) at: Land adjacent to 8 Greystone Close, Redditch, B98 9HUTPO Ref: 1965 / 93/00004/TPO1. The above tree works are proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building.2. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. In this instance the estimated repair costs are likely to vary between ??25,000 and ??105,000, depending upon whether the tree/s can be removed or must remain. 3. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. A typical underpinning scheme can include a carbon cost of more than 6000 kg CO2e and soil stabilisation or root barriers more than 4000 kg CO2e. A typical tree might capture between 15-40kg CO2e per annum and would therefore take centuries to mitigate the cost in CO2e on any alternative. We also confirm that the applicant has included this scheme and application in its tree planting and carbon capture off-set scheme for trees causing subsidence to low rise buildings which has already seen some 11,000 trees planted and additionally 220 tonnes of carbon captured.3. The above tree works are proposed to limit the duration of any claim period and therefore allow the landowner their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property.4. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant ???pollarding??? of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances.5. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following comple...
- Planning ref:
- November 2022 TPO22/214
- Type:
- Tree and hedge works
- Status:
- Decision has yet to be made
- Address:
- 8 Greystone Close Redditch Worcestershire
- Description:
- Our Ref: 213340 -Statement of Reasons for Tree Preservation Order Application to fell and treat Oak trees (T1, T2, T3) at: Land adjacent to 8 Greystone Close, Redditch, B98 9HU - TPO Ref: 1965. 1. The above tree works are proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building. 2. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. In this instance the estimated repair costs are likely to vary between ??25,000 and ??50,000, depending upon whether the tree/s can be removed or must remain. 3. The above tree works are proposed to limit the duration of any claim period and therefore allow the landowner their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property. 4. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant ???pollarding??? of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, including root barriers, would be effective or appropriate in the circumstances. 5. We are satisfied that the evidence obtained following completion of our Arboricultural Implication Assessment report completed 06/06/2019 clearly links the T1, T2 & T3 Oak trees as the cause of damage to the risk address 6. Insurers understanding the requirement to offer replacement planting in the event consent to fell is granted.
EPC Inspections
- Summary:
- 22 February 2016 - energy performance certificate grade D
- Reason for EPC:
- marketed sale
- Tenure:
- Owner-occupied
- Property type:
- Mid-Terrace House , has 5 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1967 to 1975
- Area:
- 77 sqm (829 square foot) total internal area
- Comments:
- Walls: Cavity wall, as built, no insulation (assumed). Roof: Pitched, 100 mm loft insulation. Heating: Boiler and radiators, mains gas.