24, South Road, GU24 9ES

Property data
Sale history
£185,000 on May 2002
Bedrooms
3
Type
Semi-detached
Council tax band
C
Plot size
782 square metres (8,417 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Planning applications
Planning ref:
May 2024 TWA/24/0104
Type:
Tree and hedge works
Status:
Status not known
Address:
24 South Road Bisley Woking Surrey
Description:
T4 Beech - Fell and treat stump with eco-plugsT5 Beech - Fell and treat stump with eco-plugsOur Ref: 209193Statement of Reasons for Tree Preservation Order Application to:Fell and treat stumps of two Beech trees (T4 & T5) at: 24 South Road, Bisley, Woking GU24 9ES in relation to subsidence at 101 Arethusa Way, Bisley, Woking GU24 9BYTPO Ref: 04 / 861. The above tree works are proposed as a remedy to the differential foundation movement at the insured property and to ensure the long-term stability of the building.2. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for expensive and disruptive engineering repair works at the insured property. In this instance the estimated repair costs are likely to vary between ?14,000 and ?100,000, depending upon whether the tree/s can be removed or must remain. 3. The above tree works are proposed to limit the extent and need for costly CO2e emissions relating to alternative engineering repair works at the insured property. A typical underpinning scheme can include a carbon cost of more than 6000 kg CO2e and soil stabilisation or root barriers more than 4000 kg CO2e. A typical tree might capture between 15-40kg CO2e per annum and would therefore take centuries to mitigate the cost in CO2e on any alternative. We also confirm that the applicant has included this scheme and application in its tree planting and carbon capture off-set scheme for trees causing subsidence to low rise buildings which has already seen some 11,000 trees planted and additionally 220 tonnes of carbon captured.4. The above tree works are proposed to limit the duration of any claim period and therefore allow the landowner their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their property.5. It is the case that an alternative to felling such as pruning or significant ?pollarding? of the tree would not provide a reliable or sustainable remedy to the subsidence in this case. We do not consider that any other potential means of mitigation, ...