Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Aug 2009 £118,000 -0.3% -2.8%
Aug 2005 £119,495 19.5% 17.6%
May 2003 £80,000 na na
Internal area
95 square metres (1,023 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £1,242 per square metre (£115 per square foot) in Aug 2009. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £2,363 per square metre (£220 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Aug 2009 £118,000 £1,242 £224,464 £2,363
Aug 2005 £119,495 £1,258 £217,896 £2,294
May 2003 £80,000 £842 £210,676 £2,218

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 95 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £224,464. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Rugeley are now selling for between £2,280 and £3,270 per square metre (£211 and £303 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 95 m², this implies a valuation between £217,000 and £311,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
3
Type
Semi-detached
Council tax band
B
Plot size
356 square metres (3,832 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 31 Burnthill Lane. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared May 2009.
Photos:

There are 4 archived estate agent listing photos for 31 Burnthill Lane.

Photos for 31 Burnthill Lane
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 3 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
09 February 2009 - energy performance certificate grade C
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 5 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1950 to 1966
Area:
95 sqm (1,023 square foot) total internal area
Comments: