Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Dec 2009 £165,000 2.5% 0.1%
Feb 2004 £142,500 13.9% 12.2%
Mar 1997 £57,950 na na
Internal area
62 square metres (667 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £2,661 per square metre (£247 per square foot) in Dec 2009. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £5,180 per square metre (£481 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Dec 2009 £165,000 £2,661 £321,175 £5,180
Feb 2004 £142,500 £2,298 £326,090 £5,260
Mar 1997 £57,950 £935 £342,913 £5,531

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 62 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £321,175. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Tilehurst are now selling for between £4,100 and £5,240 per square metre (£380 and £486 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 62 m², this implies a valuation between £254,000 and £325,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
3
Type
Semi-detached
Council tax band
C
Plot size
230 square metres (2,476 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 65 Rodway Road. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared Jan 2010.
Photos:

There are 3 archived estate agent listing photos for 65 Rodway Road.

Photos for 65 Rodway Road
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 3 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
11 September 2009 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 5 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1950 to 1966
Area:
62 sqm (667 square foot) total internal area
Comments: