Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
May 2009 £220,000 2.7% 0.4%
May 2003 £188,000 21.7% 20.2%
Jun 2001 £128,950 na na
Internal area
162 square metres (1,744 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £1,358 per square metre (£126 per square foot) in May 2009. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £2,290 per square metre (£213 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
May 2009 £220,000 £1,358 £370,929 £2,290
May 2003 £188,000 £1,160 £421,893 £2,604
Jun 2001 £128,950 £796 £407,148 £2,513

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 162 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £370,929. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Healing are now selling for between £2,180 and £2,520 per square metre (£202 and £234 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 162 m², this implies a valuation between £353,000 and £408,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
4
Type
Detached
Council tax band
E
Plot size
625 square metres (6,727 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 38 Wisteria Drive. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared May 2009.
Photos:

There are 12 archived estate agent listing photos for 38 Wisteria Drive.

Photos for 38 Wisteria Drive
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 4 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
10 December 2008 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 8 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1996 to 2002
Area:
162 sqm (1,744 square foot) total internal area
Comments: