Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Jul 2009 £187,000 -0.3% -2.7%
Feb 2004 £190,000 17.3% 15.7%
Sep 1997 £67,950 na na
Internal area
78 square metres (840 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £2,397 per square metre (£223 per square foot) in Jul 2009. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £5,111 per square metre (£475 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Jul 2009 £187,000 £2,397 £398,677 £5,111
Feb 2004 £190,000 £2,436 £472,378 £6,056
Sep 1997 £67,950 £871 £402,380 £5,159

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 78 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £398,677. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Slough are now selling for between £4,140 and £5,440 per square metre (£384 and £505 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 78 m², this implies a valuation between £323,000 and £424,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
3
Type
Semi-detached
Council tax band
C
Plot size
244 square metres (2,626 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 24 Maple Crescent. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared Oct 2009.
Photos:

There are 1 archived estate agent listing photos for 24 Maple Crescent.

Photos for 24 Maple Crescent
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 3 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
18 March 2009 - energy performance certificate grade E
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1950 to 1966
Area:
78 sqm (840 square foot) total internal area
Comments: