Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Dec 2009 £165,000 -1.1% -3.5%
Jul 2004 £175,000 16.6% 15.0%
May 1997 £58,000 na na
Internal area
86 square metres (926 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £1,918 per square metre (£178 per square foot) in Dec 2009. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £3,462 per square metre (£322 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Dec 2009 £165,000 £1,919 £297,760 £3,462
Jul 2004 £175,000 £2,035 £407,104 £4,734
May 1997 £58,000 £674 £403,401 £4,691

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 86 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £297,760. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Luton are now selling for between £3,280 and £4,330 per square metre (£304 and £402 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 86 m², this implies a valuation between £282,000 and £372,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
3
Type
Detached
Council tax band
D
Plot size
173 square metres (1,862 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 36 Redgrave Gardens. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared Nov 2009.
Photos:

There are 2 archived estate agent listing photos for 36 Redgrave Gardens.

Photos for 36 Redgrave Gardens
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 3 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
30 April 2009 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1976 to 1982
Area:
86 sqm (926 square foot) total internal area
Comments: