Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Sep 2010 £170,000 8.9% 6.7%
Jul 1999 £66,000 4.8% 2.8%
Feb 1996 £56,000 na na
Internal area
94 square metres (1,012 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £1,808 per square metre (£168 per square foot) in Sep 2010. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £2,939 per square metre (£273 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Sep 2010 £170,000 £1,809 £276,280 £2,939
Jul 1999 £66,000 £702 £267,179 £2,842
Feb 1996 £56,000 £596 £252,073 £2,682

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 94 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £276,280. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Ranskill are now selling for between £2,100 and £2,830 per square metre (£195 and £262 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 94 m², this implies a valuation between £197,000 and £266,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
3
Type
Detached
Council tax band
C
Plot size
523 square metres (5,630 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 7 Stonehill Close. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared Jul 2010.
Photos:

There are 7 archived estate agent listing photos for 7 Stonehill Close.

Photos for 7 Stonehill Close
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 3 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
20 February 2010 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 5 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1950 to 1966
Area:
94 sqm (1,012 square foot) total internal area
Comments: