Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Jul 2010 £120,500 0.3% -2.1%
May 2006 £119,000 15.3% 13.3%
Feb 2000 £49,000 na na
Internal area
55 square metres (592 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £2,190 per square metre (£203 per square foot) in Jul 2010. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £3,467 per square metre (£322 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Jul 2010 £120,500 £2,191 £190,712 £3,467
May 2006 £119,000 £2,164 £186,461 £3,390
Feb 2000 £49,000 £891 £198,973 £3,618

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 55 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £190,712. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Caister On Sea are now selling for between £2,500 and £3,450 per square metre (£232 and £320 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 55 m², this implies a valuation between £138,000 and £190,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
2
Type
Terrace
Council tax band
B
Plot size
215 square metres (2,314 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 7 Coxswain Read Way. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared Jun 2010.
Photos:

There are 10 archived estate agent listing photos for 7 Coxswain Read Way.

Photos for 7 Coxswain Read Way
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 2 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
14 March 2009 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 3 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1991 to 1995
Area:
55 sqm (592 square foot) total internal area
Comments: