9, Garnet Street, RG1 6BA
9 Garnet Street is a 65 m² terraced home in Reading. It sold for £165,000 in Sep 2010.
- Sale history
-
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation Sep 2010 £165,000 8.2% 6.1% Feb 1996 £52,000 na na - Internal area
- 65 square metres (700 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
- Price per internal area
-
This property sold for £2,538 per square metre (£236 per square foot) in Sep 2010. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £4,514 per square metre (£419 per square foot) .
Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm Sep 2010 £165,000 £2,538 £293,383 £4,514 Feb 1996 £52,000 £800 £351,454 £5,407 Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 65 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.
- Valuation
- The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £293,383. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Reading are now selling for between £3,700 and £4,840 per square metre (£343 and £449 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 65 m², this implies a valuation between £240,000 and £315,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Type
- Terrace
- Council tax band
- B
- Plot size
- 75 square metres (807 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
- History:
- Archived sales listing for 9 Garnet Street. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared Aug 2010.
- Photos:
-
There are 8 archived estate agent listing photos for 9 Garnet Street.
- Advertiser remarks:
-
- 2 bedrooms
- Summary:
- 12 March 2010 - energy performance certificate grade D
- Reason for EPC:
- None
- Tenure:
- Owner-occupied
- Property type:
- None , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1900 to 1929
- Area:
- 65 sqm (700 square foot) total internal area
- Comments: