8, Rowelfield, LU2 9HN
8 Rowelfield is a 85 m² semi-detached home in Luton. It sold for £184,000 in Oct 2010.
- Sale history
-
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation Oct 2010 £184,000 14.9% 12.0% Nov 2006 £108,000 na na - Internal area
- 85 square metres (915 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
- Price per internal area
-
This property sold for £2,164 per square metre (£201 per square foot) in Oct 2010. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £4,342 per square metre (£403 per square foot) .
Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm Oct 2010 £184,000 £2,165 £369,106 £4,342 Nov 2006 £108,000 £1,271 £208,420 £2,452 Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 85 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.
- Valuation
- The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £369,106. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Luton are now selling for between £3,590 and £4,660 per square metre (£333 and £432 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 85 m², this implies a valuation between £305,000 and £396,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Type
- Semi-detached
- Council tax band
- C
- Plot size
- 296 square metres (3,186 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
- History:
- Archived sales listing for 8 Rowelfield. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared Sep 2010.
- Photos:
-
There are 10 archived estate agent listing photos for 8 Rowelfield.
- Advertiser remarks:
-
- 3 bedrooms
- Summary:
- 27 April 2010 - energy performance certificate grade E
- Reason for EPC:
- None
- Tenure:
- Owner-occupied
- Property type:
- None , has 5 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1950 to 1966
- Area:
- 85 sqm (915 square foot) total internal area
- Comments: