Property data
Sale history
£463,000 on Jun 2010
Internal area
220 square metres (2,368 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £2,104 per square metre (£195 per square foot) in Jun 2010. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £3,314 per square metre (£308 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Jun 2010 £463,000 £2,105 £729,071 £3,314

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 220 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £729,071. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Solihull are now selling for between £3,420 and £5,140 per square metre (£317 and £477 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 220 m², this implies a valuation between £752,000 and £1,131,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
4
Type
Detached
Council tax band
F
Plot size
538 square metres (5,791 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Planning applications
Planning ref:
February 2007 PL/2007/00154/FULL
Type:
Full and householder planning application
Status:
Application approved
Address:
166 Widney Lane Solihul
Description:
Single storey extension to the rear to create sun lounge

Planning ref:
July 2006 PL/2006/01057/FULL
Type:
Full and householder planning application
Status:
Application approved
Address:
166 Widney Lane Solihul
Description:
First floor extension to rear to provide extended bedrooms.
EPC Inspections
Summary:
14 November 2008 - energy performance certificate grade E
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 7 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1930 to 1949
Area:
220 sqm (2,368 square foot) total internal area
Comments: