Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Jul 2010 £195,000 3.7% 1.1%
Mar 2006 £166,000 na na
Internal area
79 square metres (850 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £2,468 per square metre (£229 per square foot) in Jul 2010. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £5,109 per square metre (£475 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Jul 2010 £195,000 £2,468 £403,601 £5,109
Mar 2006 £166,000 £2,101 £355,353 £4,498

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 79 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £403,601. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Gravesend are now selling for between £3,850 and £4,730 per square metre (£357 and £439 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 79 m², this implies a valuation between £304,000 and £374,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
3
Type
Semi-detached
Council tax band
D
Plot size
465 square metres (5,005 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Planning applications
Planning ref:
July 2016 20160608
Type:
Outline application - proposal prior to a full application, including assessments and scoping opinions.
Status:
Application approved
Address:
51 Imperial Drive Gravesend Ken
Description:
Single storey rear extension with a depth of 5 metres, a maximum height of 2.9 metres and eaves height of 2.6metres.
EPC Inspections
Summary:
31 March 2010 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1950 to 1966
Area:
79 sqm (850 square foot) total internal area
Comments: