Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Oct 2010 £205,000 2.8% 0.3%
Jun 2005 £177,000 13.9% 12.1%
Oct 1996 £57,000 na na
Internal area
67 square metres (721 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £3,059 per square metre (£284 per square foot) in Oct 2010. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £6,350 per square metre (£590 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Oct 2010 £205,000 £3,060 £425,446 £6,350
Jun 2005 £177,000 £2,642 £403,677 £6,025
Oct 1996 £57,000 £851 £399,079 £5,956

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 67 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £425,446. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Romford are now selling for between £4,330 and £5,420 per square metre (£402 and £503 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 67 m², this implies a valuation between £290,000 and £363,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
2
Type
Semi-detached
Council tax band
C
Plot size
161 square metres (1,733 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 16 Cotleigh Road. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared May 2010.
Photos:

There are 5 archived estate agent listing photos for 16 Cotleigh Road.

Photos for 16 Cotleigh Road
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 2 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
03 April 2010 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1900 to 1929
Area:
67 sqm (721 square foot) total internal area
Comments: