26, Fieldsway, OL8 3AX
26 Fieldsway is a 71 m² semi-detached home in Oldham. It sold for £140,000 in Jun 2011.
- Sale history
-
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation Jun 2011 £140,000 3.2% -0.3% Apr 2010 £135,000 na na - Internal area
- 71 square metres (764 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
- Price per internal area
-
This property sold for £1,971 per square metre (£183 per square foot) in Jun 2011. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £4,551 per square metre (£423 per square foot) .
Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm Jun 2011 £140,000 £1,972 £323,092 £4,551 Apr 2010 £135,000 £1,901 £272,226 £3,834 Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 71 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.
- Valuation
- The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £323,092. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Oldham are now selling for between £1,670 and £2,710 per square metre (£155 and £251 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 71 m², this implies a valuation between £119,000 and £192,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Type
- Semi-detached
- Council tax band
- C
- Plot size
- 286 square metres (3,078 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
- History:
- Archived sales listing for 26 Fieldsway. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared May 2010.
- Photos:
-
There are 9 archived estate agent listing photos for 26 Fieldsway.
- Advertiser remarks:
-
- 3 bedrooms
- Summary:
- 16 March 2010 - energy performance certificate grade F
- Reason for EPC:
- None
- Tenure:
- Owner-occupied
- Property type:
- None , has 7 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1950 to 1966
- Area:
- 71 sqm (764 square foot) total internal area
- Comments: