Property data
Sale history
Price Date Annual growth After inflation Today's value
£240,000 Nov 2011 6.5% 4.1% £409,168
£127,000 Oct 2001 13.0% 11.3% £330,840
£85,000 Jul 1998 na na £381,218
Floor plan
Floorplan 51
View floorplan
Internal area
62 square metres (667 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
£ per square meter (foot)
£3,870 per sqm (£360 per sqft) in Nov 2011. For context, homes in Hertford are now selling for between £4,930 and £6,590 per square metre (£458 and £612 per square foot) . See the analysis of Hertford SG14-3 housing market.
Valuation comparables
Infer the current value by seeing what similar properties have sold for recently. To view this list for 51, Port Hill using the valuation comparables search tool, join now.
Bedrooms
2
Type
Terrace
Council tax band
D
Archived listings
History:
Archived rental listing for 51 Port Hill. Advertised on multiple portals. It was added on 02/03/2020. It last appeared Mar 2020.
Photos:

There are 16 photos from estate agent listings (taken in August 2019) of 51 Port Hill.

Photos for 51 Port Hill
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 3 bedrooms
  • 1 bathrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
23 April 2026 - energy performance certificate grade C
Reason for EPC:
Marketed sale
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
Mid-Terrace House , has 3 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1900 to 1929
Area:
54 sqm (581 square foot) total internal area
Comments:
Walls: Solid brick, as built, no insulation (assumed). Roof: Pitched, 150 mm loft insulation. Heating: Boiler and radiators, mains gas.

Summary:
27 July 2011 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built before 1900
Area:
62 sqm (667 square foot) total internal area
Comments:

Summary:
15 September 2009 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built before 1900
Area:
51 sqm (549 square foot) total internal area
Comments: