299, Lythalls Lane, CV6 6FZ
299 Lythalls Lane is a 85 m² semi-detached home in Longford. It sold for £132,500 in Mar 2011.
- Sale history
-
£132,500 on Mar 2011
- Floor plan
-
Archived estate agent floor plan for 299, Lythalls Lane.
- Internal area
- 85 square metres (915 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
- Price per internal area
-
This property sold for £1,558 per square metre (£145 per square foot) in Mar 2011. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £3,148 per square metre (£292 per square foot) .
Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm Mar 2011 £132,500 £1,559 £267,539 £3,148 Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 85 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.
- Valuation
- The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £267,539. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Longford are now selling for between £2,220 and £3,160 per square metre (£206 and £293 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 85 m², this implies a valuation between £189,000 and £269,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Type
- Semi-detached
- Council tax band
- B
- Plot size
- 448 square metres (4,822 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
- History:
- Archived sales listing for 299 Lythalls Lane. Advertised on multiple portals. It was added on 17/12/2010. It last appeared Mar 2011.
- Photos:
-
There are 8 archived estate agent listing photos for 299 Lythalls Lane.
- Advertiser remarks:
-
- 3 bedrooms
- Summary:
- 13 September 2010 - energy performance certificate grade D
- Reason for EPC:
- None
- Tenure:
- Owner-occupied
- Property type:
- None , has 5 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1930 to 1949
- Area:
- 85 sqm (915 square foot) total internal area
- Comments: