Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Jun 2011 £62,500 -0.1% -2.8%
Sep 2004 £63,000 56.1% 53.9%
Mar 2002 £21,000 na na
Internal area
65 square metres (700 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £961 per square metre (£89 per square foot) in Jun 2011. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £1,861 per square metre (£173 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Jun 2011 £62,500 £962 £120,981 £1,861
Sep 2004 £63,000 £969 £131,228 £2,019
Mar 2002 £21,000 £323 £79,627 £1,225

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 65 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £120,981. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Leeds are now selling for between £1,440 and £2,300 per square metre (£133 and £213 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 65 m², this implies a valuation between £94,000 and £150,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
2
Type
Terrace
Council tax band
A
Plot size
50 square metres (538 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 40 Arthington View. Advertised on multiple portals. It was added on 07/02/2011. It last appeared Jun 2011.
Photos:

There are 8 archived estate agent listing photos for 40 Arthington View.

Photos for 40 Arthington View
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 2 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
03 August 2010 - energy performance certificate grade E
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1900 to 1929
Area:
65 sqm (700 square foot) total internal area
Comments: