104, Shirley Drive, BN3 6UP
104 Shirley Drive is a 104 m² detached home in Hove. It sold for £631,000 in Oct 2011.
- Sale history
-
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation Oct 2011 £631,000 8.0% 5.4% Mar 2003 £326,250 na na - Internal area
- 104 square metres (1,119 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
- Price per internal area
-
This property sold for £6,067 per square metre (£564 per square foot) in Oct 2011. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £8,878 per square metre (£825 per square foot) .
Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm Oct 2011 £631,000 £6,067 £923,288 £8,878 Mar 2003 £326,250 £3,137 £744,946 £7,163 Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 104 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.
- Valuation
- The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £923,288. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Hove are now selling for between £5,160 and £6,770 per square metre (£479 and £628 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 104 m², this implies a valuation between £537,000 and £704,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Type
- Detached
- Council tax band
- G
- Plot size
- 722 square metres (7,772 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
- Planning ref:
- October 2015 BH2015/02780
- Type:
- Full and householder planning application
- Status:
- Application withdrawn before a decision was taken
- Address:
- 104 Shirley Drive, Hove
- Description:
- householder planning consent
- Summary:
- 05 July 2010 - energy performance certificate grade D
- Reason for EPC:
- None
- Tenure:
- Owner-occupied
- Property type:
- None , has 7 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1950 to 1966
- Area:
- 104 sqm (1,119 square foot) total internal area
- Comments: