Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Aug 2012 £337,500 3.9% 1.0%
Jun 2010 £310,000 1.5% -1.2%
Jan 2006 £290,000 na na
Internal area
102 square metres (1,098 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £3,308 per square metre (£307 per square foot) in Aug 2012. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £5,396 per square metre (£501 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Aug 2012 £337,500 £3,309 £550,423 £5,396
Jun 2010 £310,000 £3,039 £532,540 £5,221
Jan 2006 £290,000 £2,843 £596,458 £5,848

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 102 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £550,423. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Hartley are now selling for between £4,100 and £5,510 per square metre (£380 and £511 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 102 m², this implies a valuation between £418,000 and £562,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
3
Type
Detached
Council tax band
E
Plot size
564 square metres (6,071 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 29 Shearwater. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared Nov 2010.
Photos:

There are 11 archived estate agent listing photos for 29 Shearwater.

Photos for 29 Shearwater
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 3 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
27 January 2010 - energy performance certificate grade C
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1967 to 1975
Area:
102 sqm (1,098 square foot) total internal area
Comments: