Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Jan 2012 £225,000 0.9% -2.0%
Jul 2009 £220,000 5.3% 3.3%
May 2008 £207,500 15.0% 12.8%
May 1996 £39,000 na na
Internal area
124 square metres (1,335 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £1,814 per square metre (£169 per square foot) in Jan 2012. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £2,997 per square metre (£278 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Jan 2012 £225,000 £1,815 £371,619 £2,997
Jul 2009 £220,000 £1,774 £437,776 £3,530
May 2008 £207,500 £1,673 £359,027 £2,895
May 1996 £39,000 £315 £252,791 £2,039

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 124 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £371,619. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Stockton Heath are now selling for between £2,620 and £3,720 per square metre (£243 and £345 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 124 m², this implies a valuation between £325,000 and £461,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
3
Type
Terrace
Council tax band
C
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 149 Ellesmere Road. Advertised on multiple portals. It was . It last appeared Jul 2009.
Photos:

There are 10 archived estate agent listing photos for 149 Ellesmere Road.

Photos for 149 Ellesmere Road
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 3 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
12 January 2009 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 5 habitable rooms. Estimated year built before 1900
Area:
124 sqm (1,335 square foot) total internal area
Comments: