Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Jan 2012 £83,000 0.0% -2.6%
Aug 2004 £83,000 19.1% 17.2%
Mar 2001 £45,750 na na
Internal area
61 square metres (657 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £1,360 per square metre (£126 per square foot) in Jan 2012. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £2,299 per square metre (£214 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Jan 2012 £83,000 £1,361 £140,269 £2,299
Aug 2004 £83,000 £1,361 £160,183 £2,626
Mar 2001 £45,750 £750 £168,086 £2,756

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 61 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £140,269. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Scunthorpe are now selling for between £780 and £1,400 per square metre (£72 and £130 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 61 m², this implies a valuation between £48,000 and £85,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
2
Type
Semi-detached
Council tax band
B
Plot size
183 square metres (1,970 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 2 Rose Walk. Advertised on multiple portals. It was added on 13/09/2011. It last appeared Mar 2012.
Photos:

There are 11 archived estate agent listing photos for 2 Rose Walk.

Photos for 2 Rose Walk
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 2 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
19 September 2011 - energy performance certificate grade C
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 3 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1996 to 2002
Area:
61 sqm (657 square foot) total internal area
Comments: