Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Jun 2012 £145,000 -0.2% -2.8%
May 2006 £147,000 9.7% 7.6%
Mar 2003 £110,000 na na
Internal area
71 square metres (764 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £2,042 per square metre (£190 per square foot) in Jun 2012. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £3,973 per square metre (£369 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Jun 2012 £145,000 £2,042 £282,096 £3,973
May 2006 £147,000 £2,070 £318,342 £4,484
Mar 2003 £110,000 £1,549 £298,401 £4,203

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 71 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £282,096. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Rochester are now selling for between £3,320 and £4,460 per square metre (£308 and £414 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 71 m², this implies a valuation between £236,000 and £317,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
3
Type
Terrace
Council tax band
C
Plot size
239 square metres (2,573 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 12 Marley Way. Advertised on multiple portals. It was added on 03/11/2011. It last appeared Jul 2012.
Photos:

There are 8 archived estate agent listing photos for 12 Marley Way.

Photos for 12 Marley Way
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 3 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
26 October 2011 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1950 to 1966
Area:
71 sqm (764 square foot) total internal area
Comments: