Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Jul 2014 £77,000 -1.5% -3.9%
Apr 2006 £87,000 12.8% 10.9%
Apr 1996 £26,000 na na
Internal area
68 square metres (732 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £1,132 per square metre (£105 per square foot) in Jul 2014. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £1,944 per square metre (£181 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Jul 2014 £77,000 £1,132 £132,168 £1,944
Apr 2006 £87,000 £1,279 £144,690 £2,128
Apr 1996 £26,000 £382 £116,664 £1,716

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 68 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £132,168. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Cross Hands are now selling for between £1,610 and £2,290 per square metre (£149 and £212 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 68 m², this implies a valuation between £109,000 and £156,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
2
Type
Semi-detached
Council tax band
B
Plot size
242 square metres (2,605 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 62 Caeglas. Advertised on multiple portals. It was reduced on 15/08/2012. It last appeared Nov 2012.
Photos:

There are 6 archived estate agent listing photos for 62 Caeglas.

Photos for 62 Caeglas
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 2 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
25 November 2010 - energy performance certificate grade E
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1950 to 1966
Area:
68 sqm (732 square foot) total internal area
Comments: