Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Dec 2015 £173,000 0.0% -2.0%
Oct 2009 £172,950 28.1% 25.8%
May 2008 £120,000 6.8% 4.7%
Feb 1995 £50,000 na na
Internal area
206 square metres (2,217 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £839 per square metre (£78 per square foot) in Dec 2015. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £2,022 per square metre (£188 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Dec 2015 £173,000 £840 £416,575 £2,022
Oct 2009 £172,950 £840 £468,753 £2,276
May 2008 £120,000 £583 £287,022 £1,393
Feb 1995 £50,000 £243 £346,375 £1,681

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 206 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £416,575. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Manchester are now selling for between £1,750 and £2,600 per square metre (£162 and £241 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 206 m², this implies a valuation between £360,000 and £536,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
5
Type
Terrace
Council tax band
B
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 35 High Bank. Advertised on multiple portals. It was reduced on 08/10/2015. It last appeared Dec 2015.
Photos:

There are 29 archived estate agent listing photos for 35 High Bank.

Photos for 35 High Bank
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 5 bedrooms
  • 3 bathrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
29 June 2009 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 7 habitable rooms. Estimated year built before 1900
Area:
206 sqm (2,217 square foot) total internal area
Comments: