Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Aug 2016 £210,000 2.2% -0.0%
Jul 2007 £173,000 -0.7% -2.9%
Nov 2005 £174,995 na na
Internal area
64 square metres (689 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £3,281 per square metre (£305 per square foot) in Aug 2016. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £4,319 per square metre (£401 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Aug 2016 £210,000 £3,281 £276,437 £4,319
Jul 2007 £173,000 £2,703 £287,631 £4,494
Nov 2005 £174,995 £2,734 £325,883 £5,092

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 64 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £276,437. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Banbury are now selling for between £2,730 and £4,270 per square metre (£253 and £396 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 64 m², this implies a valuation between £175,000 and £273,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
2
Type
Terrace
Council tax band
C
Plot size
61 square metres (657 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 10 Alma Road. Advertised on multiple portals. It was reduced on 10/04/2016. It last appeared Sep 2016.
Photos:

There are 6 archived estate agent listing photos for 10 Alma Road.

Photos for 10 Alma Road
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 2 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
06 July 2009 - energy performance certificate grade C
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 3 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 2003 to 2006
Area:
64 sqm (689 square foot) total internal area
Comments: