Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Jan 2016 £82,000 1.4% -0.5%
Oct 2009 £75,000 -9.8% -12.3%
Jan 2008 £90,000 21.1% 18.9%
Jun 2002 £31,000 na na
Internal area
57 square metres (614 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £1,438 per square metre (£134 per square foot) in Jan 2016. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £1,553 per square metre (£144 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Jan 2016 £82,000 £1,439 £88,504 £1,553
Oct 2009 £75,000 £1,316 £83,924 £1,472
Jan 2008 £90,000 £1,579 £93,671 £1,643
Jun 2002 £31,000 £544 £65,423 £1,148

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 57 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £88,504. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Brandesburton are now selling for between £2,140 and £2,880 per square metre (£198 and £267 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 57 m², this implies a valuation between £122,000 and £164,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
na
Type
Flat
Council tax band
na
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 55 Main Street. Advertised on multiple portals. It was reduced on 23/03/2015. It last appeared Jan 2016.
Photos:

There are 8 archived estate agent listing photos for 55 Main Street.

Photos for 55 Main Street
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 2 bedrooms
  • 1 bathrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
29 September 2011 - energy performance certificate grade C
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 3 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1983 to 1990
Area:
57 sqm (614 square foot) total internal area
Comments: