Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Mar 2017 £190,000 0.7% -0.5%
Nov 2014 £187,000 -3.4% -5.6%
Aug 2010 £216,500 na na
Floor plan

Archived estate agent floor plan for 95, Dukesfield.

Floorplan 95
View floorplan
Internal area
110 square metres (1,184 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £1,727 per square metre (£160 per square foot) in Mar 2017. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £1,985 per square metre (£184 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Mar 2017 £190,000 £1,727 £218,343 £1,985
Nov 2014 £187,000 £1,700 £226,024 £2,055
Aug 2010 £216,500 £1,968 £200,625 £1,824

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 110 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £218,343. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Shiremoor are now selling for between £1,930 and £2,980 per square metre (£179 and £276 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 110 m², this implies a valuation between £212,000 and £328,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
4
Type
Terrace
Council tax band
C
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 95 Dukesfield. Advertised on multiple portals. It was added on 05/04/2016. It last appeared Mar 2017.
Photos:

There are 18 archived estate agent listing photos for 95 Dukesfield.

Photos for 95 Dukesfield
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 4 bedrooms
  • 3 bathrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
25 March 2010 - energy performance certificate grade C
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Unknown
Property type:
None Estimated year built None to None
Area:
110 sqm (1,184 square foot) total internal area
Comments: