19, Rickman Close, RG5 3LL
19 Rickman Close is a 63 m² flat in Woodley. It sold for £262,500 in Sep 2017.
- Sale history
-
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation Sep 2017 £262,500 6.6% 4.4% Aug 2010 £167,000 -1.7% -4.2% Mar 2007 £176,950 6.1% 3.6% Dec 2004 £155,000 11.1% 9.5% Sep 2001 £110,000 15.5% 13.8% Jun 1998 £68,500 na na - Floor plan
-
Archived estate agent floor plan for 19, Rickman Close.
- Internal area
- 63 square metres (678 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
- Price per internal area
-
This property sold for £4,166 per square metre (£387 per square foot) in Sep 2017. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £4,084 per square metre (£379 per square foot) .
Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm Sep 2017 £262,500 £4,167 £257,280 £4,084 Aug 2010 £167,000 £2,651 £224,604 £3,565 Mar 2007 £176,950 £2,809 £231,510 £3,675 Dec 2004 £155,000 £2,460 £218,877 £3,474 Sep 2001 £110,000 £1,746 £210,830 £3,347 Jun 1998 £68,500 £1,087 £216,969 £3,444 Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 63 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.
- Valuation
- The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £257,280. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Woodley are now selling for between £4,170 and £5,440 per square metre (£387 and £505 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 63 m², this implies a valuation between £263,000 and £343,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Type
- Flat
- Council tax band
- C
- Summary:
- 02 March 2010 - energy performance certificate grade E
- Reason for EPC:
- None
- Tenure:
- Owner-occupied
- Property type:
- None , has 3 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1967 to 1975
- Area:
- 63 sqm (678 square foot) total internal area
- Comments: