Property data
Sale history
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation
Aug 2017 £180,000 -0.1% -2.2%
Apr 2006 £181,250 13.9% 12.1%
Jul 1999 £75,500 19.4% 17.3%
Jan 1998 £57,500 na na
Internal area
84 square metres (904 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
Price per internal area

This property sold for £2,142 per square metre (£199 per square foot) in Aug 2017. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £2,737 per square metre (£254 per square foot) .

Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm
Aug 2017 £180,000 £2,143 £229,912 £2,737
Apr 2006 £181,250 £2,158 £280,562 £3,340
Jul 1999 £75,500 £899 £304,553 £3,626
Jan 1998 £57,500 £685 £210,020 £2,500

Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 84 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.

Valuation
The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £229,912. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Wideopen are now selling for between £1,960 and £2,950 per square metre (£182 and £274 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 84 m², this implies a valuation between £165,000 and £248,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
3
Type
Semi-detached
Council tax band
C
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 169 Rayleigh Drive. Advertised on multiple portals. It was added on 12/04/2011. It last appeared Jun 2011.
Photos:

There are 9 archived estate agent listing photos for 169 Rayleigh Drive.

Photos for 169 Rayleigh Drive
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 3 bedrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
13 April 2011 - energy performance certificate grade E
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Owner-occupied
Property type:
None , has 5 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1950 to 1966
Area:
84 sqm (904 square foot) total internal area
Comments: