62, Roman Way, ME17 4SH
62 Roman Way is a 75 m² flat in Coxheath. It sold for £197,500 in Jun 2018.
- Sale history
-
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation Jun 2018 £197,500 3.0% 1.0% Jun 2010 New build £155,495 na na - Floor plan
-
Archived estate agent floor plan for 62, Roman Way.
- Internal area
- 75 square metres (807 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
- Price per internal area
-
This property sold for £2,633 per square metre (£245 per square foot) in Jun 2018. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £2,807 per square metre (£261 per square foot) .
Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm Jun 2018 £197,500 £2,633 £210,528 £2,807 Jun 2010 £155,495 £2,073 £190,433 £2,539 Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 75 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.
- Valuation
- The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £210,528. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Coxheath are now selling for between £3,780 and £4,630 per square metre (£351 and £430 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 75 m², this implies a valuation between £284,000 and £347,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Type
- Flat
- Council tax band
- C
- History:
- Archived sales listing for 62 Roman Way. Advertised on multiple portals. It was added on 01/12/2017. It last appeared Jan 2018.
- Photos:
-
There are 10 archived estate agent listing photos (taken in November 2017) for 62 Roman Way.
- Advertiser remarks:
-
- 2 bedrooms
- 1 bathrooms
- Summary:
- 16 June 2010 - energy performance certificate grade B
- Reason for EPC:
- None
- Tenure:
- Unknown
- Property type:
- None Estimated year built None to None
- Area:
- 75 sqm (807 square foot) total internal area
- Comments: