Property data
Sale history
Price Date Annual growth After inflation Today's value
£450,000 Sep 2024 2.9% 0.1% £454,319
£274,950 Aug 2007 8.6% 6.5% £501,459
£194,000 May 2003 20.2% 18.0% £464,856
£128,000 Feb 2001 -11.9% -11.6% £405,936
£135,000 Sep 2000 na na £447,679
Floor plan
Floorplan 68
View floorplan
Internal area
70 square metres (753 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
£ per square meter (foot)
£6,428 per sqm (£597 per sqft) in Sep 2024. For context, homes in Guildford are now selling for between £5,340 and £6,880 per square metre (£496 and £639 per square foot) . See the analysis of Guildford GU2-7 housing market.
Implied valuation
Between £374,000 and £482,000 (70 m² × typical £/sqm in Guildford). Treat this as context only. To value this property using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
Bedrooms
3
Type
Semi-detached
Council tax band
D
Plot size
225 square metres (2,422 square feet) - map showing freehold boundary lines
Archived listings
History:
Archived sales listing for 68 Raymond Crescent. Advertised on multiple portals. It was reduced on 08/07/2024. It last appeared Apr 2024.
Photos:

There are 8 photos from estate agent listings of 68 Raymond Crescent.

Photos for 68 Raymond Crescent
View photos
Advertiser remarks:
  • 3 bedrooms
  • 1 bathrooms
EPC Inspections
Summary:
16 May 2019 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
Rental
Tenure:
Private rental
Property type:
Semi-Detached House , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1930 to 1949
Area:
70 sqm (753 square foot) total internal area
Comments:
Walls: Cavity wall, as built, no insulation (assumed). Roof: Pitched, 100 mm loft insulation. Heating: Boiler and radiators, mains gas.

Summary:
11 June 2009 - energy performance certificate grade D
Reason for EPC:
None
Tenure:
Private rental
Property type:
None , has 4 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1900 to 1929
Area:
83 sqm (893 square foot) total internal area
Comments: