64, Scot Lane, BL6 5SH
64 Scot Lane is a 66 m² terraced home in Horwich. It sold for £135,000 in Jan 2017.
- Sale history
-
Date Paid price Annual growth After inflation Jan 2017 £135,000 6.6% 4.5% Dec 1997 £40,000 na na - Floor plan
-
Archived estate agent floor plan for 64, Scot Lane.
- Internal area
- 66 square metres (710 square feet) according to latest EPC inspection
- Price per internal area
-
This property sold for £2,045 per square metre (£190 per square foot) in Jan 2017. Indexed forward to today's value, this is roughly £3,301 per square metre (£307 per square foot) .
Date Paid price Paid £/sqm Today's value Today's value £/sqm Jan 2017 £135,000 £2,045 £217,866 £3,301 Dec 1997 £40,000 £606 £196,823 £2,982 Calculated using the latest EPC internal area of 66 m². Earlier sale dates may not have had the same measured area available.
- Valuation
- The most recent sale price indexed forward to today's value is £217,866. This is one data point to inform the valuation. Another method is the valuation implied by what comparable homes are selling for. Homes in Horwich are now selling for between £1,930 and £3,040 per square metre (£179 and £282 per square foot). Based on an internal area of 66 m², this implies a valuation between £127,000 and £201,000. Treat this as context only. For a valuation using hand-picked comparable sales, use the Advanced search tool — create a shortlist of similar condition homes, then export a valuation report.
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Type
- Terrace
- Council tax band
- C
- History:
- Archived sales listing for 64 Scot Lane. Advertised on multiple portals. It was added on 14/09/2016. It last appeared Feb 2017.
- Photos:
-
There are 12 archived estate agent listing photos for 64 Scot Lane.
- Advertiser remarks:
-
- 3 bedrooms
- 1 bathrooms
- Summary:
- 12 May 2009 - energy performance certificate grade E
- Reason for EPC:
- None
- Tenure:
- Private rental
- Property type:
- None , has 5 habitable rooms. Estimated year built 1967 to 1975
- Area:
- 66 sqm (710 square foot) total internal area
- Comments: